It’s been a year of bad publicity for Big Tech. Not only has the public’s trust in technology companies plummeted, the sector is now looking at increased pressure from lawmakers.
Over the past several months, both houses of Congress have targeted large technology companies in new legislation. The increased scrutiny began in June, when House lawmakers proposed bipartisan legislation that would effectively break up companies like Amazon, Apple, Google and Meta (formerly Facebook).
While that bill would face significant challenges, a separate House proposal targets “self-preferencing,” which it defines as conduct that “advantages the covered platform operator’s own products, services, or lines of business over those of another business user.” Now, a bipartisan group of senators have come out in favor of similar legislation that would curb self-preferencing.
Bill would prohibit platforms from favoring their own products
The Senate legislation announced on Oct. 14 that it would prohibit self-preferencing, along with a host of other practices that it says are harmful to both business and consumers. The American Innovation and Choice Online Act is being sponsored by Amy Klobuchar (D., Minn.), the chairwoman of the Senate antitrust subcommittee, and Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the Judiciary Committee’s top Republican.
Klobuchar highlighted a recent dispute between the streaming company Roku and YouTube, which Google owns. “Google continues to interfere with Roku’s independent search results, requiring that we preference YouTube over other content providers,” wrote Roku in a blog post. Roku alleges that YouTube is threatening to remove its app from their platform if it doesn’t agree to these practices.
For too long, the big tech platforms have leveraged their power to preference their products and services over those of thousands of smaller online businesses. They have said ‘just trust us,’ but experience has shown that we can’t rely on these companies to act fairly in the marketplace.
If passed, this legislation would have a major impact on Big Tech. According to one analysis by The Markup, 41% of the first page of Google search results is taken up by Google products. It’s incredibly lucrative: Google makes five times as much revenue by advertising on its own properties as it does selling ads on third-party websites. Another Markup investigation found that Amazon places its own products ahead of competitors even when the competitors had higher ratings and more reviews.
This is the kind of practice Congress is looking to deter. Klobuchar told The Washington Post that the bill is a long-overdue update to competition laws, as existing antitrust laws “written in the era of railroads and oil barons are not equipped to address the unique ways that Silicon Valley can harm competition and consumers.”
Separate bill would make social media companies liable for content
On the same day the self-preferencing legislation was introduced, a separate law was proposed by the House Energy and Commerce Committee. The Justice Against Malicious Algorithms Act would amend Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, making social media companies liable for “knowingly or recklessly” promoting harmful content.
This increased scrutiny comes on the heels of the Wall Street Journal’s “Facebook Files” investigation, which found that the company has been fully aware of the platform’s harmful effects. One internal presentation slide from 2019 bluntly states, “We make body image issues worse for one in three teen girls.”
Social media platforms like Facebook continue to actively amplify content that endangers our families, promotes conspiracy theories, and incites extremism to generate more clicks and ad dollars. These platforms are not passive bystanders — they are knowingly choosing profits over people, and our country is paying the price.
While this amendment to Section 230 is primarily supported by Democrats, there is growing bipartisan pressure to amend the 1998 Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act to include a digital marketing bill of rights for minors.
One version proposed in May 2021 would ban targeted advertising directed towards children, limit the collection of personal information of teens and force companies to create an “Eraser Button” for parents and kids. So far, the bill has not been voted on.
There are currently several proposals being considered, and while most of them have broad bipartisan support, Congress has struggled before to pass laws targeting tech companies.
According to the nonprofit OpenSecrets, Amazon spent $15.3 million on lobbying efforts in 2021, Facebook spent $14.7 million and Alphabet (Google’s parent company) spent $9 million — all in the top 20 of the highest spenders. That said, there has never been as much public pressure on Congress to reign in Big Tech, so we may see new laws passed sooner than later.
Allconnect: Let us compare providers for you
Why should you choose Allconnect? We’re the #1 broadband marketplace in the U.S, meaning you can trust us to search, compare and order internet and TV service for your home.Get started
Written by:Joe Supan
Senior Writer, Broadband Content
Joe Supan is the senior writer for Allconnect and MyMove. He has helped build the proprietary metrics used on Allconnect’s review pages, utilizing thousands of data points to help readers navigate these comple… Read more
Edited by:Robin Layton
Editor, Broadband Content
- FeaturedCongress included $65 billion for broadband in the infrastructure bill. How will it affect you? Joe Supan — 6 min read
- FeaturedGuide to online safety: Phishing, scams and fraud prevention Ari Howard — 15 min read
- FeaturedKeep your kids safe online: All you need to know about internet safety at school and home David Anders — 11 min read
Friday, May 13, 2022Eligible households can now get high-speed internet for free
Robin Layton — 2 min read
Wednesday, May 11, 2022LGBTQ youth resources: Bridging the digital divide
Robin Layton — 10 min read
Wednesday, May 4, 2022What is a good internet speed? It depends on your needs
David Anders — 7 min read